Difference between revisions of "Talk:Careerprise Literacy"
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | Kevin: | + | Kevin. I moved many parts on the page. Now: |
*"Have humble background", "Time conscious", "Consistent at work" -- why is that? Those guys don't drop from schools :) | *"Have humble background", "Time conscious", "Consistent at work" -- why is that? Those guys don't drop from schools :) | ||
*"Available for 20+ hours in a week" -- no, just full-time if we want to get the results faster. | *"Available for 20+ hours in a week" -- no, just full-time if we want to get the results faster. | ||
| + | |||
| + | I also don't know what to do with these: | ||
| + | |||
| + | '''Communication''' | ||
| + | * Facebook page | ||
| + | * Campus messaging and notifications. | ||
| + | * Website. | ||
| + | * CNM Wiki. | ||
| + | |||
| + | '''How to increase effectiveness of the Pipeline''' | ||
| + | * Ultimate penalty of disqualification to candidates who do not follow instructions. | ||
| + | * Set exams that require applicants to read deeply and understand the program and what is required of them. | ||
| + | * Closely monitor performance and availability of each applicant. | ||
| + | * Increase standards to be met by applicants in terms of tasks issued and time spent to accomplish the tasks. | ||
| + | |||
| + | But I definitely know that I don't want to "penalize". For what reason? If some participant has found another job while being in program, let say, it is our success story, not a reason for a penalty. | ||
| + | |||
--[[User:Gary|Nizhnih]] ([[User talk:Gary|talk]]) 16:08, 2 February 2019 (UTC) | --[[User:Gary|Nizhnih]] ([[User talk:Gary|talk]]) 16:08, 2 February 2019 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 16:33, 2 February 2019
Kevin. I moved many parts on the page. Now:
- "Have humble background", "Time conscious", "Consistent at work" -- why is that? Those guys don't drop from schools :)
- "Available for 20+ hours in a week" -- no, just full-time if we want to get the results faster.
I also don't know what to do with these:
Communication
- Facebook page
- Campus messaging and notifications.
- Website.
- CNM Wiki.
How to increase effectiveness of the Pipeline
- Ultimate penalty of disqualification to candidates who do not follow instructions.
- Set exams that require applicants to read deeply and understand the program and what is required of them.
- Closely monitor performance and availability of each applicant.
- Increase standards to be met by applicants in terms of tasks issued and time spent to accomplish the tasks.
But I definitely know that I don't want to "penalize". For what reason? If some participant has found another job while being in program, let say, it is our success story, not a reason for a penalty.
