Difference between revisions of "Talk:Careerprise Literacy"
Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
--[[User:Gary|Nizhnih]] ([[User talk:Gary|talk]]) 16:08, 2 February 2019 (UTC) | --[[User:Gary|Nizhnih]] ([[User talk:Gary|talk]]) 16:08, 2 February 2019 (UTC) | ||
+ | |||
+ | Possible Partners | ||
+ | https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1qmh9o2M41sgO2jSldwjAmfnLy2b6Hxr-MEWK4x70tso/edit?usp=sharing |
Revision as of 19:22, 2 February 2019
Requirements
Kevin, I moved many parts on the page. Now:
- "Have humble background", "Time conscious", "Consistent at work" -- why is that? Those guys don't drop from schools :)
- "Available for 20+ hours in a week" -- no, just full-time if we want to get the results faster.
I also don't know what to do with these:
Communication
- Facebook page
- Campus messaging and notifications.
- Website.
- CNM Wiki.
How to increase effectiveness of the Pipeline
- Ultimate penalty of disqualification to candidates who do not follow instructions.
- Set exams that require applicants to read deeply and understand the program and what is required of them.
- Closely monitor performance and availability of each applicant.
- Increase standards to be met by applicants in terms of tasks issued and time spent to accomplish the tasks.
But I definitely know that I don't want to "penalize". For what reason? If some participant has found another job while being in program, let say, it is our success story, not a reason for a penalty.
--Nizhnih (talk) 16:08, 2 February 2019 (UTC)
Possible Partners https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1qmh9o2M41sgO2jSldwjAmfnLy2b6Hxr-MEWK4x70tso/edit?usp=sharing