Difference between revisions of "Fiedler contingency model"
(Created page with "Managerial grid (hereinafter, the ''Grid'') is #400px|thumb|right|[[Full Range Leadership Model]]'''Full Range Leadership Model'''. A...") |
MariamKhalid (talk | contribs) |
||
| (5 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | [[ | + | [[File:Fiedler-contingency.png|400px|thumb|right|[[Fiedler contingency model]]]][[Fiedler contingency model]] (hereinafter, the ''Model'') is a model that suggests that effective group performance depends on the proper match between a leader's orientation, whether he or she is [[task orientation|task-oriented]] or [[Human relations orientation|people-oriented]], and the degree to which the situation allows the leader to control and influence. The ''model'' (1) uses a [[least preferred coworker questionnaire]] to classify leaders, (2) assumes that leaders cannot be both [[task orientation|task-oriented]] or [[Human relations orientation|people-oriented]], and (3) suggests that [[Human relations orientation|people orientation]] is the best match to the situations with moderate control, while those leaders who are [[task orientation|task-oriented]] best perform in situations with high or low control. |
| + | ==Definitions== | ||
| + | According to [[Organizational Behavior by Robbins and Judge (17th edition)]], | ||
| + | :[[Fiedler contingency model]]. The theory that effective groups depend on a proper match between a leader's style of interacting with subordinates and the degree to which the situation gives control and influence to the leader. | ||
| + | According to [[Management by Robbins and Coulter (14th edition)]], | ||
| + | :[[Fiedler contingency model]]. A leadership theory proposing that effective group performance depends on the proper match between a leader's style and the degree to which the situation allows the leader to control and influence. | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| + | ==Related concepts== | ||
| + | *[[Least preferred coworker questionnaire]]. An instrument that purports to measure whether a person is task or relationship oriented. The ''questionnaire'' has initially been developed for the [[Fiedler contingency model]]. | ||
| − | ==Related | + | ==Related lectures== |
| − | + | *[[Leadership Quarter]]. | |
| − | [[Category: Septem Artes Administrativi]][[Category: Articles]] | + | [[Category:Management]][[Category: Septem Artes Administrativi]][[Category: Articles]] |
Latest revision as of 16:01, 3 June 2020
Fiedler contingency model (hereinafter, the Model) is a model that suggests that effective group performance depends on the proper match between a leader's orientation, whether he or she is task-oriented or people-oriented, and the degree to which the situation allows the leader to control and influence. The model (1) uses a least preferred coworker questionnaire to classify leaders, (2) assumes that leaders cannot be both task-oriented or people-oriented, and (3) suggests that people orientation is the best match to the situations with moderate control, while those leaders who are task-oriented best perform in situations with high or low control.
Definitions
According to Organizational Behavior by Robbins and Judge (17th edition),
- Fiedler contingency model. The theory that effective groups depend on a proper match between a leader's style of interacting with subordinates and the degree to which the situation gives control and influence to the leader.
According to Management by Robbins and Coulter (14th edition),
- Fiedler contingency model. A leadership theory proposing that effective group performance depends on the proper match between a leader's style and the degree to which the situation allows the leader to control and influence.
Related concepts
- Least preferred coworker questionnaire. An instrument that purports to measure whether a person is task or relationship oriented. The questionnaire has initially been developed for the Fiedler contingency model.
