Difference between revisions of "Talk:Educaship Proxmox"
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
[[CNMCyber Team]] (hereinafter, [[#We]]) currently administers [[#The VE]]. | [[CNMCyber Team]] (hereinafter, [[#We]]) currently administers [[#The VE]]. | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
==Requirements== | ==Requirements== | ||
Revision as of 14:04, 16 April 2024
Proxmox for CNM Farms (hereinafter, #The Project) is the group of endeavors undertaken to advance key aspects of Educaship Proxmox (hereinafter, #The VE) including its functionality, usability, reliability, performance, security, scalability, and user satisfaction.
CNMCyber Team (hereinafter, #We) currently administers #The VE.
Contents
Requirements
Business
Prototypes
Stakeholder's
Deliverable
Work
States
Certainty
Utility
Applicability
Controllability
Hello, Michel ! Here are a few brief answers to your questions. Please let me know what else you'd like to know. 1\. We have multiple Jitsi installations, one of which is in Docker. In this installation, there is no sound at all. Also, when updating Docker, a conference is not created. 2\. We are experiencing some issues obtaining a certificate for a site running behind Pfsense. Due to the absence of the certificate, the service becomes completely unavailable 3\. We have several websites whose databases are combined in a Galera Cluster. We need a solution for these websites' files to have a shared storage. We tried GlusterFS, but it seemed too slow to us. We copied the files to this storage for almost a week, and as a result, the website did not work. 4\. In some cases, we have used Ansible. We are open to any solution 5\. We use Grafana for Proxmox. We would like to add several servers that do not use Proxmox, configure communication channels, and expand monitoring according to our tasks.
