Difference between revisions of "FD 360826 Questionable Practice"
(→GAJ's request for justice) |
(→GAJ's request for justice) |
||
Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
==GAJ's request for justice== | ==GAJ's request for justice== | ||
− | Since ''GAJ'' wasn't given any opportunity to argue on the issue, ''GAJ'' mailed his request for justice to the Loudoun District Court, offices of the Loudoun County Board of Supervisors, and Commonwealth's Attorney. On February 7th, 20, ''GAJ'' wrote:<blockquote><p>Dear County Board of Supervisors Officer,</p><p>If the county has established some non-abusing policy and the several officers failed to execute it, I would appreciate your info. I would also appreciate if adjustments are made based on my concern.</p><p>Dear County District Court Officer,</p><p>I wonder whether judges have even seen such abusing tickets such I attach. If they are, why didn't anyone question the the Loudoun County's tendency to execute justice while bypassing any court? Please be aware that I would love to be heard in the court on either the situation on October 18th, 2018, or this very concern, or both.</p><p>Dear Commonwealth's Attorney Officer,</p><p>I would like to bring to your attention my perception that the Loudoun County alternates justice while abusing its visitors and denying the justice. I believe that the actions of several representatives of the county are illegal. At least, these actions are immoral and offensive.</p><p>I also wonder about timing of the notice. I might be wrong, but it looks like Mr. H. Roger Zurn, Jr., or someone(s) else decided to finance the budget using its police and ticket capacities. May I ask you to collect better information on the issue?</p><p>Dear Officers,</p><p>Please note that I was born and raised in former republics of the Soviet bloc. I am highly sensitive to the authoritative practices. Correct -- I am highly sensitive. I cannot call, for instance, Mr. H. Roger Zurn, Jr. a "motherf--er" even if he is the one. And he unlikely is. At the same time, I would understand if coordinators in his office and police would represent some region of authoritative Belarus. However, abusing people, denying them justice, and trying to make money out of this denial and abuse should not be tolerated in the Commonwealth of Virginia. Especially, when being practiced by county officials.</p><p>Please let me know what you believe I can possibly do. If you believe that I didn't do something that I could do, please let me know as well. I seek for the justice I have denied so far, and, beyond that, I also seek for improvements in the County's practices.</p></blockquote> | + | Since ''GAJ'' wasn't given any opportunity to argue on the issue, ''GAJ'' mailed his request for justice to the Loudoun District Court, offices of the Loudoun County Board of Supervisors, and Commonwealth's Attorney. On February 7th, 20, ''GAJ'' wrote:<blockquote><p>Dear County Board of Supervisors Officer,</p><p>If the county has established some non-abusing policy and the several officers failed to execute it, I would appreciate your info. I would also appreciate if adjustments are made based on my concern.</p><p>Dear County District Court Officer,</p><p>I wonder whether judges have even seen such abusing tickets such I attach. If they are, why didn't anyone question the the Loudoun County's tendency to execute justice while bypassing any court? Please be aware that I would love to be heard in the court on either the situation on October 18th, 2018, or this very concern, or both.</p><p>Dear Commonwealth's Attorney Officer,</p><p>I would like to bring to your attention my perception that the Loudoun County alternates justice while abusing its visitors and denying the justice. I believe that the actions of several representatives of the county are illegal. At least, these actions are immoral and offensive.</p><p>I also wonder about timing of the notice. I might be wrong, but it looks like Mr. H. Roger Zurn, Jr., or someone(s) else decided to finance the budget using its police and ticket capacities. May I ask you to collect better information on the issue?</p><p>Dear Officers,</p><p>Please note that I was born and raised in former republics of the Soviet bloc. I am highly sensitive to the authoritative practices. Correct -- I am highly sensitive. I cannot call, for instance, Mr. H. Roger Zurn, Jr. a "motherf--er" even if he is the one. And he unlikely is. At the same time, I would understand if coordinators in his office and police would represent some region of authoritative Belarus. However, abusing people, denying them justice, and trying to make money out of this denial and abuse should not be tolerated in the Commonwealth of Virginia. Especially, when being practiced by county officials.</p><p>Please let me know what you believe I can possibly do. If you believe that I didn't do something that I could do, please let me know as well. I seek for the justice I have been denied so far, and, beyond that, I also seek for improvements in the County's practices.</p></blockquote> |
Revision as of 21:19, 7 February 2019
FD 360826 Questionable Practice is a practice of Loudoun County, Virginia to finance the county through notices that is in question for some concerned residents.
Contents
FD 360826
On October 18th, 2018, one driver, referred here as GAJ, was picking a passenger at the International Washington Dulles Airport. GAJ waited for the passenger in the dedicated cell-phone parking and, when the passenger called that he is standing at Door 4 on the upper arrivals level, GAJ started moving towards the door.
According to GAJ, the traffic was heavy. Several traffic officers tried to regulate it. While following their instructions, GAJ parked at the closest spot to the Door 4, picked up the passenger and his luggage and left the airport. GAJ asserts that GAJ didn't park nor wait for the passenger -- the passenger was waiting at the door and it took very short time to load the luggage and get the passenger sited in the car.
Later in that day, GAJ discovered No FD 360826 "Notice of parking violation" at the windshield. The notice stated that "Violation of posted sign" as its reason.
GAJ returned to the airport and failed to find any sign that GAJ could possibly violate. However, another part of the notice deeply offended GAJ -- the notice stated that GAJ received the "Violator's copy," so the Loudoun County made its decision that GAJ is a violator without any judiciary authority.
Informing the County about its abusing practice
In writing, GAJ informed the Loundoun County about its practices that GAJ believed to be abusive. By this letter, GAJ expressed the will to contest any allegations. On November 12th, 2018 left the United States because of a trip overseas.
H. Roger Zurn, Jr. office responses
On December 19th, 2018, GAJ returned back, to the United States from the trip overseas. GAJ discovered two mailings from the office of the Loudoun County Treasurer, H. Roger Zurn, Jr. The first letter was signed by Klayton Lambert, "Information Services Asst." and stated,
We have received your letter regarding Dulles Parking Ticket FD360826. If you wish to contest this ticket, you must call 703-777-0280, to request a date to appear before the Loudoun General District Court. [...] You must establish a court date or pay by 11/26/2018.
Another mailing was a "Notice of unpaid parking violation." The notice contained threats and asserted the same statements that GAJ believed was abusive. Particularly, it stated,
If you have any questions regarding this violation, [...] please contact our office.
H. Roger Zurn, Jr. office literally requested GAJ to admit the violation in order to ask questions about it.
GAJ's request for justice
Since GAJ wasn't given any opportunity to argue on the issue, GAJ mailed his request for justice to the Loudoun District Court, offices of the Loudoun County Board of Supervisors, and Commonwealth's Attorney. On February 7th, 20, GAJ wrote:
Dear County Board of Supervisors Officer,
If the county has established some non-abusing policy and the several officers failed to execute it, I would appreciate your info. I would also appreciate if adjustments are made based on my concern.
Dear County District Court Officer,
I wonder whether judges have even seen such abusing tickets such I attach. If they are, why didn't anyone question the the Loudoun County's tendency to execute justice while bypassing any court? Please be aware that I would love to be heard in the court on either the situation on October 18th, 2018, or this very concern, or both.
Dear Commonwealth's Attorney Officer,
I would like to bring to your attention my perception that the Loudoun County alternates justice while abusing its visitors and denying the justice. I believe that the actions of several representatives of the county are illegal. At least, these actions are immoral and offensive.
I also wonder about timing of the notice. I might be wrong, but it looks like Mr. H. Roger Zurn, Jr., or someone(s) else decided to finance the budget using its police and ticket capacities. May I ask you to collect better information on the issue?
Dear Officers,
Please note that I was born and raised in former republics of the Soviet bloc. I am highly sensitive to the authoritative practices. Correct -- I am highly sensitive. I cannot call, for instance, Mr. H. Roger Zurn, Jr. a "motherf--er" even if he is the one. And he unlikely is. At the same time, I would understand if coordinators in his office and police would represent some region of authoritative Belarus. However, abusing people, denying them justice, and trying to make money out of this denial and abuse should not be tolerated in the Commonwealth of Virginia. Especially, when being practiced by county officials.
Please let me know what you believe I can possibly do. If you believe that I didn't do something that I could do, please let me know as well. I seek for the justice I have been denied so far, and, beyond that, I also seek for improvements in the County's practices.