Difference between revisions of "Evaluation"
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
According to the [[BABOK Guide|BABOK Guide (3rd edition)]], | According to the [[BABOK Guide|BABOK Guide (3rd edition)]], | ||
:[[Evaluation]]. The systematic and objective assessment of a solution to determine its status and efficacy in meeting objectives over time, and to identify ways to improve the solution to better meet objectives. See also indicator; metric, monitoring. | :[[Evaluation]]. The systematic and objective assessment of a solution to determine its status and efficacy in meeting objectives over time, and to identify ways to improve the solution to better meet objectives. See also indicator; metric, monitoring. | ||
| + | According to [[Looking Out, Looking In by Adler, Proctor (15th edition)]], | ||
| + | :[[Evaluation]]. Gibb's term for judgmental assessments of another person's behavior, thereby increasing the odds of creating a defensive communication climate. See also [[description]], [["I" language]]. | ||
| − | [[Category: Quality Management]][[Category: Articles]][[Category: Business Analysis]] | + | [[Category: Quality Management]][[Category: Articles]][[Category: Business Analysis]][[Category: Human Communications]] |
Latest revision as of 16:41, 10 July 2020
Evaluation is the assessment of how relevant resources and capabilities are to generic strategies in generic internal assessment.
Definition
According to Managing Quality by Foster (6th edition),
- Evaluation. Assessment of how relevant resources and capabilities are to generic strategies in generic internal assessment.
According to the BABOK Guide (3rd edition),
- Evaluation. The systematic and objective assessment of a solution to determine its status and efficacy in meeting objectives over time, and to identify ways to improve the solution to better meet objectives. See also indicator; metric, monitoring.
According to Looking Out, Looking In by Adler, Proctor (15th edition),
- Evaluation. Gibb's term for judgmental assessments of another person's behavior, thereby increasing the odds of creating a defensive communication climate. See also description, "I" language.
