Difference between revisions of "Fiedler contingency model"

From CNM Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 1: Line 1:
[[File:Leadership-styles.png|400px|thumb|right|[[Full Range Leadership Model]]]]'''[[Full Range Leadership Model]]'''. A model that depicts seven managerial [[leadership style]]s on a continuum: (1) [[laissez-faire style|laissez-faire]], (2) [[management by exception]], (3) [[contingent reward leadership]], (4) [[individualized consideration]], (5) [[intellectual stimulation]], (6) [[inspirational motivation]], and (7) [[idealized influence]].
 
#*[[Laissez-faire style]]. Leadership style of someone who lets the group make decisions and complete the work in whatever way it sees fit.
 
#[[File:Managerial-grid.png|400px|thumb|right|[[Managerial grid]]]]'''[[Managerial grid]]'''. A two-dimensional grid for appraising [[leadership style]]s.
 
 
[[File:Fiedler-contingency.png|400px|thumb|right|[[Fiedler contingency model]]]][[Fiedler contingency model]] (hereinafter, the ''Model'') is a model that suggests that effective group performance depends on the proper match between a leader's orientation, whether he or she is [[task orientation|task-oriented]] or [[Human relations orientation|people-oriented]], and the degree to which the situation allows the leader to control and influence. The ''model'' (1) uses a [[least preferred coworker questionnaire]] to classify leaders, (2) assumes that leaders cannot be both [[task orientation|task-oriented]] or [[Human relations orientation|people-oriented]], and (3) suggests that [[Human relations orientation|people orientation]] is the best match to the situations with moderate control, while those leaders who are [[task orientation|task-oriented]] best perform in situations with high or low control.
 
[[File:Fiedler-contingency.png|400px|thumb|right|[[Fiedler contingency model]]]][[Fiedler contingency model]] (hereinafter, the ''Model'') is a model that suggests that effective group performance depends on the proper match between a leader's orientation, whether he or she is [[task orientation|task-oriented]] or [[Human relations orientation|people-oriented]], and the degree to which the situation allows the leader to control and influence. The ''model'' (1) uses a [[least preferred coworker questionnaire]] to classify leaders, (2) assumes that leaders cannot be both [[task orientation|task-oriented]] or [[Human relations orientation|people-oriented]], and (3) suggests that [[Human relations orientation|people orientation]] is the best match to the situations with moderate control, while those leaders who are [[task orientation|task-oriented]] best perform in situations with high or low control.
  

Revision as of 10:19, 20 November 2018

Fiedler contingency model (hereinafter, the Model) is a model that suggests that effective group performance depends on the proper match between a leader's orientation, whether he or she is task-oriented or people-oriented, and the degree to which the situation allows the leader to control and influence. The model (1) uses a least preferred coworker questionnaire to classify leaders, (2) assumes that leaders cannot be both task-oriented or people-oriented, and (3) suggests that people orientation is the best match to the situations with moderate control, while those leaders who are task-oriented best perform in situations with high or low control.

Related coursework

  1. Leadership Quarter.