Difference between revisions of "Talk:Careerprise Literacy"

From CNM Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 1: Line 1:
Kevin:
+
Kevin. I moved many parts on the page. Now:
 
*"Have humble background", "Time conscious", "Consistent at work" -- why is that? Those guys don't drop from schools :)
 
*"Have humble background", "Time conscious", "Consistent at work" -- why is that? Those guys don't drop from schools :)
 
*"Available for 20+ hours in a week" -- no, just full-time if we want to get the results faster.
 
*"Available for 20+ hours in a week" -- no, just full-time if we want to get the results faster.
 +
 +
I also don't know what to do with these:
 +
 +
'''Communication'''
 +
* Facebook page
 +
* Campus messaging and notifications.
 +
* Website.
 +
* CNM Wiki.
 +
 +
'''How to increase effectiveness of the Pipeline'''
 +
* Ultimate penalty of disqualification to candidates who do not follow instructions.
 +
* Set exams that require applicants to read deeply and understand the program and what is required of them.
 +
* Closely monitor performance and availability of each applicant.
 +
* Increase standards to be met by applicants in terms of tasks issued and time spent to accomplish the tasks.
 +
 +
But I definitely know that I don't want to "penalize". For what reason? If some participant has found another job while being in program, let say, it is our success story, not a reason for a penalty.
 +
 
--[[User:Gary|Nizhnih]] ([[User talk:Gary|talk]]) 16:08, 2 February 2019 (UTC)
 
--[[User:Gary|Nizhnih]] ([[User talk:Gary|talk]]) 16:08, 2 February 2019 (UTC)

Revision as of 16:33, 2 February 2019

Kevin. I moved many parts on the page. Now:

  • "Have humble background", "Time conscious", "Consistent at work" -- why is that? Those guys don't drop from schools :)
  • "Available for 20+ hours in a week" -- no, just full-time if we want to get the results faster.

I also don't know what to do with these:

Communication

  • Facebook page
  • Campus messaging and notifications.
  • Website.
  • CNM Wiki.

How to increase effectiveness of the Pipeline

  • Ultimate penalty of disqualification to candidates who do not follow instructions.
  • Set exams that require applicants to read deeply and understand the program and what is required of them.
  • Closely monitor performance and availability of each applicant.
  • Increase standards to be met by applicants in terms of tasks issued and time spent to accomplish the tasks.

But I definitely know that I don't want to "penalize". For what reason? If some participant has found another job while being in program, let say, it is our success story, not a reason for a penalty.

--Nizhnih (talk) 16:08, 2 February 2019 (UTC)