Обсуждение:Делова Ферма — различия между версиями

Материал из Брацка Правки
Перейти к: навигация, поиск
(→‎Обсуждение проекта создания)
(→‎Обсуждение проекта создания)
Строка 20: Строка 20:
 
:# I have researched the IPv6 topic more and decided not to add IPv4. According to Google (who else would know better?), 38% of the Internet is already IPv6. May you include a possibility of adding IPv4 to vSwitch with public IP into documentation?
 
:# I have researched the IPv6 topic more and decided not to add IPv4. According to Google (who else would know better?), 38% of the Internet is already IPv6. May you include a possibility of adding IPv4 to vSwitch with public IP into documentation?
 
:# Starting with lxc containers for each app sounds reasonable. All of the apps need to using HA feature.
 
:# Starting with lxc containers for each app sounds reasonable. All of the apps need to using HA feature.
−
:# I like your one-ip-for-each-app idea. So, should I do 2a01:4f8:fff0:53::2, 2a01:4f8:fff0:53::3, etc.
+
:# I like your one-ip-for-each-app idea. So, should I do 2a01:4f8:fff0:53::2, 2a01:4f8:fff0:53::3, etc.?
 
:# I cannot estimate the number of Jitsi users. There were fewer than 10 before. I guess that we can target 50 as a max for now.
 
:# I cannot estimate the number of Jitsi users. There were fewer than 10 before. I guess that we can target 50 as a max for now.
 
:# I am not familiar with the pfsense firewall, but am open to it. When you wrote, "so only need 1 public ip to all those vms or containers," did you mean IPv4?
 
:# I am not familiar with the pfsense firewall, but am open to it. When you wrote, "so only need 1 public ip to all those vms or containers," did you mean IPv4?

Версия 01:09, 24 июля 2022

Обсуждение проекта создания

Подрядчик
Your HA proxmox was ready. I have tested it, and it running well.. You can do trial and testing meanwhile I am writing its documentation ... However, Not all users could access IPv6, you must have ISP ipv6 supported, modem ipv6 supported and devices ipv6 supported. ... That's why, I changed my ISP to ISP ipv6 supported. And now, I can access IPv6 and IPv4
Заказчик
To test, I am going to assign a domain name and install a HumHub instance. How would you recommend installing that? What address shall I use for the domain name? ... I didn't get what I should do in regards to your IPv6 concerns. Do you want me to create one more vSwitch and buy IPv4 for that?
Подрядчик
Currently our proxmox is running well on ipv6, I put 2 domains using ipv6. First pm1.seethisnow.site, and second wordpress403.ntbprov.go.id. ... Can you ping to both of them? ... If not, you are the owner of these all services and can't reach your own assets. So, how can we sell these services?, Meanwhile not all of our team members could access it. That means, ipv6 only for specific target, and it is not common for all users out there yet for now. FYI, wordpress currently doesn't support ipv6 yet, so you can't install wordpress to server that only using ipv6. ... to sum up, my point is our servers is ipv6 ready and everything goes well on ipv6. I just think about your market target? Did they all ipv6 supported already? If not, I think you should consider about ipv4, I know it is quite expensive. But for now, ipv4's scope area much larger than ipv6. ... If I only thinking about my self, I would say "we should use ipv6". However, I cant be like that, I believe money is easy thing to find. And my satisfaction is when I can help you to reach your goal. And last but not least, decision is yours.
Заказчик
  1. I succeeded in pinging both pm1.seethisnow.site and wordpress403.ntbprov.go.id
  2. At the moment, we plan to have HumHub, Odoo, SuiteCRM, and, possibly, Jitsi there. I purchased a separate Cloudflare service for Wordpress. We may try to install all and ask our team members whether they can access.
  3. What if we make both IPv4 and IPv6?
  4. It looks like we could save money if we purchased IPv6 only servers, couldn't we?
P.S. I asked you two questions that you didn't address --
  • How do you recommend installing our applications?
  • What address shall I use for the domain name? 2a01:4f8:fff0:53::2 ?
Подрядчик
for better experience, we can use lxc containers for each apps. If lxc container not enough, we can upgrade to vm. ... then you can decide, which apps need to using HA feature. ... If you want easier to manage, you can use one ip for each apps, and lxc container very light (because we have so many ipv6, but if you want to use ipv6 yes we can use only 1 ip address). how many users will use jitsi? ... I can make all those apps behind pfsense firewall, so only need 1 public ip to all those vms or containers, except jitsi. Jitsi better use public ip directly. ... if you want add public ipv4, please add to vswitch with public ip. so we can use ipv4 and ipv6 simultaneously
Заказчик
  1. I have researched the IPv6 topic more and decided not to add IPv4. According to Google (who else would know better?), 38% of the Internet is already IPv6. May you include a possibility of adding IPv4 to vSwitch with public IP into documentation?
  2. Starting with lxc containers for each app sounds reasonable. All of the apps need to using HA feature.
  3. I like your one-ip-for-each-app idea. So, should I do 2a01:4f8:fff0:53::2, 2a01:4f8:fff0:53::3, etc.?
  4. I cannot estimate the number of Jitsi users. There were fewer than 10 before. I guess that we can target 50 as a max for now.
  5. I am not familiar with the pfsense firewall, but am open to it. When you wrote, "so only need 1 public ip to all those vms or containers," did you mean IPv4?
Подрядчик
  1. Sure, I can include a possibility of adding IPv4 to vSwitch with public IP into documentation.
  2. All of the apps will be lxc containers using HA feature.
  3. 2a01:4f8:fff0:53::2, 2a01:4f8:fff0:53::3, etc. addresses will work.
  4. With regards to Jitsi, we can create a vm or container with 8 cpu core for maximum 50 participants. Or if you have a small groups, you can use talk from nextcloud. Or if you think, you need a video conference for student or engineer, you can use bigbluebutton.
  5. Pfsense is a firewall OS, you can using ipv4 only, ipv6 only, or both of them. I just suggest if we use ipv4, so that could help to make more efficient in using ipv4. All vps behind firewall will using a private network, or network on vSwitch with non-public IP. And all internet connection will through pfsense interface.
Заказчик
Источник — «https://pravka.bskol.com/w1/index.php?title=Обсуждение:Делова_Ферма&oldid=24844»