Feasibility Study Quarter

Feasibility Study Quarter (hereinafter, the Quarter) is the second of four lectures of Portfolio Quadrivium (hereinafter, the Quadrivium):

• The Quarter is designed to introduce its learners to enterprise discovery, or, in other words, to concepts related to obtaining data needed to administer the enterprise effort; and
• The Quadrivium examines concepts of administering various types of enterprises known as enterprise administration as a whole.

The Quadrivium is the first of seven modules of Septem Artes Administrativi, which is a course designed to introduce its learners to general concepts in business administration, management, and organizational behavior.

Outline

Idea Generation Quarter is the predecessor lecture. In the enterprise discovery series, the previous lecture is Bookkeeping Quarter.

Portfolio analysis is the enterprise analysis of data needed to design and/or modify the enterprise portfolio. Organizationally, the data needed to design or modify these products is collected through idea generation, validated learning, monitoring, and market engagements. This particular lecture concentrates on validated learning because these enterprise efforts are the primary method for collecting data that emerges as a result of product developments. This lecture concentrates on feasibility study of proposed changes because the data collected from operational businesses is analyzed through controlling.

Concepts

1. Feasibility study. In enterprise administration, an assessment of the practical potential of a proposed change. Depending on the nature of the proposed change and the complexity of its implementation, this assessment may consist of one or more evaluations; a feasibility study may also not be feasible itself. Feasibility study can also be described as an evaluation of proposed alternatives to determine if they are legally and technically possible within the constraints of the enterprise and whether they will deliver the desired benefits to the enterprise.
   • Proposed change. Any change that is proposed in order to be implemented.
   • Proposed change implementation. A project undertaken in order to implement the proposed change.
2. Change. In enterprise administration, the act or instance of becoming different and/or doing business differently.
   • Unexpected change. Change activities that are unintentional and not necessarily goal oriented.
   • Planned change. Change activities that are intentional and goal oriented.
3. Idea evaluation. An appraisal of potential solutions to problems to identify the best one.
   • Evaluation. The systematic and objective assessment of a solution to determine its status and efficacy in meeting objectives over time, and to identify ways to improve the solution to better meet objectives. See also metric, indicator and monitoring.
   • Domain. The problem area undergoing analysis.
   • Opportunity analysis. The process of examining new business opportunities to improve organizational performance.
   • Enterprise environmental complexity. The number of components in an enterprise's environment and the extent of the enterprise's knowledge about its components.
   • Enterprise environmental uncertainty. The degree of change and complexity in an enterprise's environment.
   • Social screening. Approving social criteria (screens) to investment decisions.
4. Idea prioritization. The process that arranges proposed changes in order of importance relative to each other based on a review of the means available and the impact of trade-offs to attain the objectives.
   • Prioritization. The process of determining the relative importance of a set of items in order to determine the order in which they will be addressed.
   • Abstraction. The ability of engineers to think of design concepts that are not dependent on specific solutions.
5. Change readiness assessment. An assessment that describes whether stakeholders are prepared to accept the change associated with a solution and are able to use it effectively.
   • Business capability. A function of an organization that enables it to achieve a business goal or objective.
   • Compliance feasibility. An assessment of how the proposed change would conflict with legal, corporate, and other mandated requirements.
   • Integration feasibility. An assessment of how the proposed change would conflict with existing systems that the enterprise already employs.
6. Cost-benefit analysis. An analysis of the difference between the change benefit estimate, which is what the enterprise is going to obtain, and change cost estimate, which is what the enterprise is going to lose when some proposed change is implemented. In other words, the financial and non-financial costs of making a change or implementing a solution are compared and quantified to the benefits gained during this analysis. Usually, the cost-benefit analysis is the core of feasibility study.
   • Change benefit estimate. The difference between the positive and negative impacts of the proposed change. The positive impact can be assessed as the expected total value that the enterprise is going to obtain after a proposed change is implemented. The negative impact is what the enterprise is going to lose. These estimates may have several components and may be obtained as a result of an impact analysis.
7. Impact analysis. An assessment of the impact that a proposed change will have on a stakeholder or stakeholder group, project, or system.
   • Political impact. Political advantages and disadvantages gained from the proposed change implementation.
   • Economic impact. A profit gained from the proposed change implementation.
   • Social impact. Social advantages and disadvantages gained from the proposed change implementation.
   • Technological impact. Technological advantages and disadvantages gained from the proposed change implementation.
8. Change cost estimate. The expected total cost of a set of enterprise efforts undertaken in order to implement a proposed change when it is implemented. This estimate is always approximated. In other words, it is what the enterprise is going to lose as a result of the proposed change implementation. Because the cost likely depends on the payroll and the payroll depends on work time, a schedule estimate needs to be evaluated before the cost. Because the schedule likely depends on the work to be accomplished, a effort estimate needs to be evaluated before the schedule. Because the work definitely depends on the change scope, a change scope needs to be developed first of all.
   • Change scope. All the features and functions that characterize a proposed change.
   • Effort estimate. The expected effort or work that needs to be accomplished to deliver a product with the specified features and functions.
   • Life-cycle costing. The concept of including acquisition, operating, and disposal costs when evaluating various alternatives.
   • Schedule estimate. The expected time of the delivery of a product with the specified features and functions.
9. Market analysis. Studies of the attractiveness, the risks, and the dynamics of the market that is identified by the analysis' buyer. Sometimes, market research is considered being the first phase of the market analysis.
   • Market. A place or space in which commercial dealings are conducted including a regular gathering of people for the purchase and sale of products. Collectively, the buyers create the market demand; the sellers create the market supply.
   • Planned economy. An economic system in which economic decisions are planned by a central government.
   • Free market economy. An economic system in which resources are primarily owned and controlled by the private sector.
   • Valuation. The process by which a company's worth or value is determined. An analyst will look at capital structure, management team, and revenue or potential revenue, among other things.
10. Competitive intelligence. The ability to control market research, to identify the data about the competitors, to process the identified data in order to acquire knowledge, and to apply the knowledge towards understanding and anticipating competitors' actions rather than merely react to them.
    • Competition. The activity or condition of competing on the market. The buyers may compete over purchases of a product; more frequently, the sellers compete over sales of a product.
    • Competitive analysis. A structured process which captures the key characteristics of an industry to predict the long-term profitability prospects and to determine the practices of the most significant competitors.
    • Competitor analysis. Performing an audit or conducting user testing of competing websites and apps; writing a report that summarizes the competitive landscape.

Roles

1. Idea champion. An individual who takes on a particular change and actively and enthusiastically promote the change idea, build support, overcome resistance, and ensure that the change is implemented.
2. Change agent. An individual who acts as a catalyst and assumes the responsibility for supporting proposed change implementation.
3. Subject matter expert (SME). A stakeholder with specific expertise in an aspect of the problem domain or potential solution alternatives or components.
   • Implementation subject matter expert (SME). A stakeholder who will be responsible for designing, developing, and implementing the change described in the requirements and have specialized knowledge regarding the construction of one or more solution components.
   • Domain subject matter expert (SME). A person with specific expertise in an area or domain under investigation.
4. Investor.
   • Angel investor. A private investor or group of private investors who offers financial backing to an entrepreneurial venture in return for equity in the venture. Typically, angel investors provide small amounts of capital at early stages of startup development, usually when it is in its infancy, and before a seed round.
   • Venture capitalist. An individual investor, who works for a venture capital firm and is authorized by it to professionally manage pools of investor money in order to invest in specific companies. Venture capitalists typically have a focused market or sector that they know well and invest in. Venture capitalists never or almost never invest in infant startups.

Methods

1. Idea-evaluation technique. An established procedure for idea evaluation.
   • Visual comparison. An idea evaluation technique that represents a comparison of two or more proposed ideas by eye. The ideas may be placed side by side, overlaid, or being dynamically alternated. This technique also include a pairwise comparison.
   • Scoring. An idea evaluation technique that encourages its participants to score proposed changes with one or more criteria in order to prioritize those changes. This technique also include the five star assessment and pass or fail test. Those techniques can be implemented in various ways, either online or onsite, including a simple or anonymous voting.
   • Proof of concept. Evidence, typically derived from an experiment or pilot project, which demonstrates that a design concept, business proposal, etc., is feasible. Many venture capitalists require a demonstration of the feasibility of a concept or idea that a startup is based on in order to fund it.
2. Due diligence. An analysis an investor makes of all the facts and figures of a potential investment. Can include an investigation of financial records and a measure of potential ROI.
   • ROI estimating. An idea evaluation technique that represents an attempt to expect the return on investment (ROI) ratio for a proposed change.
   • Funding. The act of providing financial resources, usually in the form of money, or other values such as effort or time, to finance a need, program, and project, usually by an organization.
   • Equity crowdfunding. The online offering of private company securities to a group of people for investment and therefore it is a part of the capital markets.
   • Venture capital (VC). Money provided by venture capital firms to small, high-risk, startup companies with major growth potential.
3. Assumptions analysis. A technique that explores the assumptions' accuracy and identifies risks to the project from inaccuracy, inconsistency, or incompleteness of assumptions.
   • Assumption. An environment factor that is believed to be true, real, or certain, but have not been confirmed to be accurate. While being simplified for early planning purposes, assumptions may be considered to be true without questioning. At the same time, assumptions generally involve a degree of risk. For risk identification, assumptions may be questioned. In project management, assumptions affect all aspects of project planning, and are part of the progressive elaboration of the project. Project teams frequently identify, document, and validate assumptions as part of their planning process.
4. Force field analysis. A graphical method for depicting the forces that support and oppose a proposed change. Involves identifying the forces, depicting them on opposite sides of a line (supporting and opposing forces) and then estimating the strength of each set of forces.

Instruments

1. Idea evaluation tool. A tangible and/or software implement used to evaluate concepts.
   • Pros and cons table. An idea evaluation tool that usually represents two columns, one of the advantages called "pros" and another for disadvantages called "cons."
   • What if question. An idea and risk evaluation tool that encourages asking "What if?" while evaluating an idea.
   • Should we question. An idea evaluation tool that encourages asking "Should we?" while evaluating an idea.
2. Affinity diagram (or affinity diagramming). A business tool used to organise a large number of ideas, sorting them into groups based on their natural relationships, for review and analysis.
3. Gantt chart. A project management tool that represents actual and planned output over a period of time. In other words, it is a graphic display of schedule-related information. In the typical Gantt chart, activities or other project elements are listed down the left side of the chart, dates are shown across the top, and activity durations are shown as date-placed horizontal bars. Any bar shows the start and finish dates of the activity it represents. The chart was initially developed by Henry Gantt.
   • Load chart. A modified Gantt chart that schedules capacity by entire departments or specific resources.
4. SWOT framework. A tool that maps analyses of the enterprise environment. SWOT is an acronym for strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats.
   • Strength. Any activity the organization does well or its unique resource.
   • Weakness. An activity the organization does not do well or a resource it needs but does not possess.
   • Opportunity. A positive trend in the enterprise environment.
   • Threat. A negative trend in the enterprise environment.
5. Porter's five forces framework. A tool that maps analyses of competition of a business. The five forces include (a) threat of new entrants, (b) threat of substitutes, (c) bargaining power of customers, (d) bargaining power of suppliers, and (e) industry rivalry.

Results

1. Feasible idea (or feasible alternative). Reviews of available alternate procurement actions which could attain the objectives.
   • Verified idea (or verified alternative).
   • Validated idea (or validated alternative).
2. Business case. An assessment of the costs and benefits associated with a proposed initiative.

Practices

1. Methods and instruments used for stakeholder engagement can be always or nearly always applied to change support analysis.
2. Some researches agree that the SWOT framework shall be outsourced if an enterprise decides to employ it. Porter's five forces framework initially indented to better map the enterprise environment.

Enterprise Architecture Quarter is the successor lecture. In the enterprise analysis series, the next lecture is Business Analysis Quarter.