Difference between revisions of "Social Rationale Quarter"

From CNM Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Methods)
(Methods)
Line 100: Line 100:
 
#'''[[Means, motive, and opportunity]]'''. A common summation of the three aspects of an action; legally, that ''summation'' must be established before guilt can possibly be determined in a criminal proceeding.
 
#'''[[Means, motive, and opportunity]]'''. A common summation of the three aspects of an action; legally, that ''summation'' must be established before guilt can possibly be determined in a criminal proceeding.
 
#'''[[Avoidance technique]]'''.<blockquote><table class="wikitable" width=100%><tr><th colspan="2">[[Avoiding technique]]</th></tr><tr><td style="text-align:center;">'''[[Action avoidance]]'''</td><td><ul><li>[[Overconforming]]. </li><li>[[Buck passing]]. </li><li>[[Playing dumb]]. </li><li>[[Stretching]]. </li><li>[[Stalling]]. </li></ul></td></tr><tr><td style="text-align:center;">'''[[Blame avoidance]]'''</td><td><ul><li>[[Buffing]]. </li><li>[[Playing safe]]. </li><li>[[Justifying]]. </li><li>[[Scapegoating]]. </li><li>[[Misrepresenting]]. </li></ul></td></tr><tr><td style="text-align:center;">'''[[Change avoidance]]'''</td><td><ul><li>[[Prevention]]. </li><li>[[Self-protection]]. </li></ul></td></tr><tr><td style="text-align:center;">'''[[Decision avoidance]]'''</td><td><ul><li>[[Pause]]. </li><li>[[Additional information request]]. </li><li>[[Additional consideration request]]. </li><li>[[Additional approval request]]. </li><li>[[Future consideration promise]]. </li><li>[[Partial agreement]]. </li><li>[[Understanding expression]]. </li></ul></td></tr></table></blockquote>
 
#'''[[Avoidance technique]]'''.<blockquote><table class="wikitable" width=100%><tr><th colspan="2">[[Avoiding technique]]</th></tr><tr><td style="text-align:center;">'''[[Action avoidance]]'''</td><td><ul><li>[[Overconforming]]. </li><li>[[Buck passing]]. </li><li>[[Playing dumb]]. </li><li>[[Stretching]]. </li><li>[[Stalling]]. </li></ul></td></tr><tr><td style="text-align:center;">'''[[Blame avoidance]]'''</td><td><ul><li>[[Buffing]]. </li><li>[[Playing safe]]. </li><li>[[Justifying]]. </li><li>[[Scapegoating]]. </li><li>[[Misrepresenting]]. </li></ul></td></tr><tr><td style="text-align:center;">'''[[Change avoidance]]'''</td><td><ul><li>[[Prevention]]. </li><li>[[Self-protection]]. </li></ul></td></tr><tr><td style="text-align:center;">'''[[Decision avoidance]]'''</td><td><ul><li>[[Pause]]. </li><li>[[Additional information request]]. </li><li>[[Additional consideration request]]. </li><li>[[Additional approval request]]. </li><li>[[Future consideration promise]]. </li><li>[[Partial agreement]]. </li><li>[[Understanding expression]]. </li></ul></td></tr></table></blockquote>
#'''[[Conflict-management technique]]'''. An established [[procedure]], either a [[conflict-resolution technique|conflict-resolution]] or [[conflict-stimulation technique]], for [[conflict management]].<blockquote><table class="wikitable" width=100%><tr><th>Purpose</th><td style="text-align:center;">Category</td><th>[[Conflict-management technique]]</th></tr><tr><td rowspan="5" style="text-align:center;">[[Conflict-resolution technique|Resolution technique]]</td><th>[[Withdraw and avoid]]</th><td><ul><li>[[Conflict avoidance]]. Withdrawal from or suppression of the conflict.</li></ul></td></tr><tr><th>[[Smooth and accommodate]]</th><td><ul><li>[[Smoothing]]. Playing down differences while emphasizing common interests between the conflicting parties.</li><li>[[Conflict crashing]]. Expansion of the resources can create a win-win solution especially when a conflict is caused by the scarcity of a resource (for example, money, promotion, opportunities, office space, etc.).</li></ul></td></tr><tr><th>[[Compromise and reconcile]]</th><td><ul><li>[[Compromise]]. Each party to the conflict gives up something of value.</li><li>[[Engaging a third party]]. </li></ul></td></tr><tr><th>[[Force and direct]]</th><td><ul><li>[[Authoritative conflict-resolution]]. In a formal setting, an [[authority]] may use its powers to resolve the conflict and then communicate its desires to the parties involved.</li></ul></td></tr><tr><th>[[Collaborate and problem solve]]</th><td><ul><li>[[Problem solving]]. Face-to-face meeting of the conflicting parties for the purpose of identifying the problem and resolving it through open discussion.</li><li>[[Superordinate goal setting]]. Creating a shared goal that cannot be attained without the cooperation of each of the conflicting parties.</li><li>[[Improving the human variables]]. Using behavioral change techniques such as human relations training to alter attitudes and behaviors that cause conflict.</li><li>[[Improving the structural variables]]. Changing the formal organization structure and the interaction patterns of conflicting parties through job redesign, transfers, creation of coordinating positions, and the like.</li></ul></td></tr><tr><td colspan="2" style="text-align:center;">'''[[Conflict-stimulation technique]]'''</td><td><ul><li>[[Provocative communication]]. Using ambiguous or threatening messages to increase conflict levels.</li><li>[[Bringing in outsiders]]. Adding employees to a group whose backgrounds, values, attitudes, or managerial styles differ from those of present members.</li><li>[[Stressing the structure]]. Realigning [[workgroup]]s, altering rules and regulations, increasing interdependence, and making similar structural changes to disrupt the status quo.</li><li>[[Appointing a devil's advocate]]. Designating a critic to purposely argue against the majority positions held by the group.</li></ul></td></tr></table></blockquote>
+
#'''[[Conflict-management technique]]'''. An established [[procedure]], either a [[conflict-resolution technique|conflict-resolution]] or [[conflict-stimulation technique]], for [[conflict management]].<blockquote><table class="wikitable" width=100%><tr><th>Purpose</th><td style="text-align:center;">Category</td><th>[[Conflict-management technique]]</th></tr><tr><td rowspan="5" style="text-align:center;">[[Conflict-resolution technique|Resolution technique]]</td><th>[[Withdraw and avoid]]</th><td><ul><li>[[Conflict avoidance]]. Withdrawal from or suppression of the conflict.</li></ul></td></tr><tr><th>[[Smooth and accommodate]]</th><td><ul><li>[[Smoothing]]. Playing down differences while emphasizing common interests between the conflicting parties.</li><li>[[Conflict crashing]]. Expansion of the resources can create a win-win solution especially when a conflict is caused by the scarcity of a resource (for example, money, promotion, opportunities, office space, etc.).</li></ul></td></tr><tr><th>[[Compromise and reconcile]]</th><td><ul><li>[[Compromise]]. Each party to the conflict gives up something of value.</li><li>[[Engaging a third party]]. </li><li>[[Distributive bargaining]]. </li></ul></td></tr><tr><th>[[Force and direct]]</th><td><ul><li>[[Authoritative conflict-resolution]]. In a formal setting, an [[authority]] may use its powers to resolve the conflict and then communicate its desires to the parties involved.</li></ul></td></tr><tr><th>[[Collaborate and problem solve]]</th><td><ul><li>[[Problem solving]]. Face-to-face meeting of the conflicting parties for the purpose of identifying the problem and resolving it through open discussion.</li><li>[[Integrative bargaining]]. </li><li>[[Engaging a mediator]]. </li><li>[[Superordinate goal setting]]. Creating a shared goal that cannot be attained without the cooperation of each of the conflicting parties.</li><li>[[Improving the human variables]]. Using behavioral change techniques such as human relations training to alter attitudes and behaviors that cause conflict.</li><li>[[Improving the structural variables]]. Changing the formal organization structure and the interaction patterns of conflicting parties through job redesign, transfers, creation of coordinating positions, and the like.</li></ul></td></tr><tr><td colspan="2" style="text-align:center;">'''[[Conflict-stimulation technique]]'''</td><td><ul><li>[[Provocative communication]]. Using ambiguous or threatening messages to increase conflict levels.</li><li>[[Bringing in outsiders]]. Adding employees to a group whose backgrounds, values, attitudes, or managerial styles differ from those of present members.</li><li>[[Stressing the structure]]. Realigning [[workgroup]]s, altering rules and regulations, increasing interdependence, and making similar structural changes to disrupt the status quo.</li><li>[[Appointing a devil's advocate]]. Designating a critic to purposely argue against the majority positions held by the group.</li></ul></td></tr></table></blockquote>
 
#*[[Conflict-stimulation technique]].  
 
#*[[Conflict-stimulation technique]].  
 
#[[File:Conflict-resolution.png|400px|thumb|right|[[Conflict-resolution technique]]]]'''[[Conflict-resolution technique]]'''.  
 
#[[File:Conflict-resolution.png|400px|thumb|right|[[Conflict-resolution technique]]]]'''[[Conflict-resolution technique]]'''.  

Revision as of 01:37, 22 May 2018

Social Rationale Quarter (hereinafter, the Quarter) is a lecture introducing the learners to social analysis primarily through key topics related to social rationale. The Quarter is the second of four lectures of Social Quadrivium, which is the fifth of seven modules of Septem Artes Administrativi (hereinafter, the Course). The Course is designed to introduce the learners to general concepts in business administration, management, and organizational behavior.


Outline

Communication Quarter is the predecessor lecture. In the enterprise analysis series, the previous lecture is Human Perceptions Quarter.

Concepts

  1. Social rationale. A set of reasons or a logical basis for a course of action or a particular belief of a group of people.
    • Institutions. Cultural factors that lead many organizations to have similar structures, especially those factors that might not lead to adaptive consequences.
    • Group cohesiveness (also known as group cohesion or social cohesion). The extend to which members of a group support and validate one another, attracted and emotionally attached to one another, share the group's goals, and motivated toward the group.
    • Norm. An acceptable standard or expectation within a group that is accepted and shared by a group's members.
    • Ingroup favorism. Perspective in which we see members of our ingroup as better than other people, and people not in our group as all the same.
  2. Group. Two or more interacting and interdependent individuals who come together to achieve particular goals.
    • Informal group. A group that is neither formally structured nor organizationally determined; such a group appears in response to the need for social contact.
    • Formal group. A designated workgroup defined by an organization's structure.
    • Interacting group. A typical group in which members interact with each other face to face.
    • Reference group. An important group to which individuals belong or hope to belong and with whose norms individuals are likely to conform.
  3. Role. A set of expected behavior patterns attributed to someone occupying a given position in a social unit.
    • Role ambiguity. When role expectations are not clearly understood.
    • Role expectations. How others believe a person should act in a given situation.
    • Role overload. Having more work to accomplish than time permits.
    • Role perception. An individual's view of how he or she is supposed to act in a given situation.
  4. Status. A socially defined position or rank given to groups or group members by others.
  5. Social identity theory. Perspective that considers when and why individuals consider themselves members of groups.
    • Outgroup. The inverse of an ingroup, which can mean everyone outside the group, but more usually an identified other group.
    • Ingroup.
    • Faultiness. The perceived divisions that split groups into two or more subgroups based on individual differences such as sex, race, age, work experience, and education.
    • Boundary spanning. When individuals form relationships outside their formally assigned groups.
  6. Diversity. The extent to which members of a group are similar to, or different from, one another.
    • Deep-level diversity. Differences in values, personality, and work preferences that become more important for determining similarity as people get to know each other.
    • Discrimination. Noting of a difference between things; often we refer to unfair discrimination, which means making judgments about individuals based on stereotypes regarding their demographic group. Unfair discrimination occurs when someone acts out their prejudicial attitudes toward people who are the targets of their prejudice.
  7. Surface-level diversity. Differences in easily perceived characteristics, such as gender, race, ethnicity, age, or disability, that do not necessarily reflect the ways people think or feel, but may activate or trigger certain stereotypes.
    • Biographical characteristic. A quantifiable personal characteristic such as age, gender, income, education, socioeconomic status, family size, marital status, race, and length of tenure that are objective and easily obtained from personnel records. These characteristics are indicators of surface-level diversity.
    • Race. The biological heritage (including skin color and associated traits) that people use to identify themselves.
  8. Cultural intelligence. Cultural awareness and sensitivity skills.
    • Dominant culture. A culture that expresses the core values that are shared by a majority of the organization's members.
    • National culture. The values and attitudes shared by individuals from a specific country that shape their behavior and beliefs about what is important.
    • Strong culture. A culture in which the core values are intensely held and widely shared.
    • Ethnicity. Social traits (such as cultural background or allegiance) that are shaped by a human population.
  9. Culture attribute. A quality or feature regarded as a characteristic or inherent part of culture.
    • Power distance. A national culture attribute that describes the extent to which a society accepts that power in institutions and organizations is distributed unequally.
    • Collectivism. A national culture attribute that describes a tight social framework in which people expect others in groups of which they are a part to look after them and protect them.
    • Individualism. A national culture attribute that describes the degree to which people prefer to act as individuals rather than as members of groups.
    • Long-term orientation. A national culture attribute that emphasizes the future, thrift, and persistence.
    • Short-term orientation. A national culture attribute that emphasizes the present and accepts change.
    • Masculinity. A national culture attribute that describes the extent to which the culture favors traditional masculine work roles of achievement, power, and control. Societal values are characterized by assertiveness and materialism.
    • Femininity. A national culture attribute that indicates little differentiation between male and female roles; a high rating indicates that women are treated as the equals of men in all aspects of the society.
    • Uncertainty avoidance. A national culture attribute that describes the extent to which a society feels threatened by uncertain and ambiguous situations and tries to avoid them.
  10. Preconceived attitude. An attitude that someone has already had about representatives of some group without learning about their actual characteristics.
    • Prejudice. A preconceived belief, opinion, or judgment toward a person or a group of people.
    • Stereotyping. Judging someone on the basis of a perception of the group to which that person belongs.
  11. Cultural attitude. An attitude that someone has toward own and other cultures.
    • Parochialism. Viewing the world solely through your own perspectives, leading to an inability to recognize differences between people.
    • Geocentric attitude. A world-oriented view that focuses on using the best approaches and people from around the globe.
    • Ethnocentric attitude. The parochial belief that the best work approaches and practices are those of the home country.
    • Polycentric attitude. The view that the managers in the host country know the best work approaches and practices for running their businesses.
  12. Conflict. (1) Perceived incompatible differences that result in interference or opposition; (2) A process that begins when one party perceives that another party has negatively affected, or is about to negatively affect, something that the first party cares about.
  13. Conflict process. A process that has five stages: (1) conflict potential, potential opposition or incompatibility, (2) cognition and personalization, (3) intentions, (4) behavior, and (5) outcomes.
  14. Conflict potential. Latent qualities or abilities that may be developed and lead to a conflict.
  15. Conflict personalization. A situation in the conflict process in which one or more parties feel or perceive that the conflict exists. is a perception issue, second step of the Conflict Process.
    • Felt conflict. Emotional involvement in a conflict that creates anxiety, tenseness, frustration, or hostility.
    • Perceived conflict. Awareness by one or more parties of the existence of conditions that create opportunities for conflict to arise.
  16. Conflict intention. One's aim, plan, or intention for conflict process and its outcomes.
    • Collaborating. A situation in which the parties to a conflict each desire to satisfy fully the concerns of all parties.
    • Competing. A desire to satisfy one's interests, regardless of the impact on the other party of the conflict.
    • Compromising. A situation in which each party to a conflict is willing to give up something.
    • Accommodating. The willingness of one party in a conflict to place the opponent's interests above his or her own.
    • Avoiding. The desire to withdraw from or suppress a conflict.
  17. Conflict outcome. An outcome from a conflict process.
  18. Conflict management. Handling a conflict.
  19. Emotional intelligence. The ability to detect and to manage emotional cues and information.
    • Emotional dissonance. Inconsistencies between the emotions people feel and the emotions they project.
    • Surface acting. Hiding one's inner feelings and forgoing emotional expressions in response to display rules.
    • Deep acting. Trying to modify one's true inner feelings based on display rules.
    • Mindfulness. Objectively and deliberately evaluating the emotional situation in the moment.

Roles

  1. Social service provider. The government, private, and non-profit organization that is engaged in creating more effective organizations, building stronger communities, and promoting equality and opportunity.

Methods

  1. Change support analysis. An evaluation of the stakeholder support of the and, vice versa, the resistance to this change.
  2. Means, motive, and opportunity. A common summation of the three aspects of an action; legally, that summation must be established before guilt can possibly be determined in a criminal proceeding.
  3. Avoidance technique.
    Avoiding technique
    Action avoidance
    Blame avoidance
    Change avoidance
    Decision avoidance
  4. Conflict-management technique. An established procedure, either a conflict-resolution or conflict-stimulation technique, for conflict management.
    PurposeCategoryConflict-management technique
    Resolution techniqueWithdraw and avoid
    Smooth and accommodate
    • Smoothing. Playing down differences while emphasizing common interests between the conflicting parties.
    • Conflict crashing. Expansion of the resources can create a win-win solution especially when a conflict is caused by the scarcity of a resource (for example, money, promotion, opportunities, office space, etc.).
    Compromise and reconcile
    Force and direct
    Collaborate and problem solve
    Conflict-stimulation technique
  5. Conflict-resolution technique.

Instruments

  1. Group development. A model that describes the process of developing a group.
  2. Punctuated-equilibrium model. A set of phases that temporary groups go through that involves transitions between inertia and activity.
    • Punctuated equilibrium. The hypothesis that evolutionary development is marked by isolated episodes of rapid speciation between long periods of little or no change.

Practices

Information Architecture Quarter is the successor lecture. In the enterprise analysis series, the next lecture is Regulatory Сompliance Quarter.

Materials

Recorded audio

Recorded video

Live sessions

Texts and graphics

See also